|
The Grapes of Wrath
Lecture Notes
Themes
The Bond between land and people
For the tenant farmers of the novel, to be torn away from their land is a
shattering experience, akin to death itself. See Muley Graves
- The effects of technology
The tenant farmers rely on growing methods of bygone days. Because
machines can make land profitable, landowning banks send in tractors and
dozers. Machine drivers lose touch with the soil; in effect, they become
nonhuman pieces of equipment.
When the Joads change from farm people to road people, they have to cast
off not onlly many of their belongings, but their habits and customs as
well.
People need each other every step of the way. Muley shares his rabbit
with Tom and Casy. The Wilsons can’t go on without assistance from the
Joads. The Wallaces invite Tom to work with them. Mrs. Wainwright aids Rose
of Sharon in childbirth. Rose of Sharon offers her milk to a dying man.
- Government for the people and by the people
Only in Weedpatch do the migrant people find safety and comfort.
When workers stick together in a righteous cause, they can accomplish
anything. But you have to be prepared to make sacrifices. If you break with
your brother, you’ll be hurting both him and yourself.
Anger in many guises dominates the book. Why else call it The Grapes
of Wrath? The tenant farmers are angry at the landowners. Roadside
characters such as the one-eyed man are angry with themselves. Californians’
fear of the migrants turns to anger. And most of all, the migrants are
angry. In a land of plenty, they are starving.
The pursuit of money is a perfectly legitimate activity in our society.
But what happens when, in the quest for the dollar, human values are
forgotten? Banks force people from their homes; big farmers eat up little
farmers; landowners exploit workers; food is burned and buried; people
starve. At what point does the pursuit of money turn into a crime?
Embodied by the Joads and Ma Joad in particular. The story celebrates the
indomitable human spirit.
- "I" to "we"
- the brotherhood of man
Modernism
- Despair, hopelessness, chaos
- Novel about the American Dream – both the original notion that a solid
Christian work ethic can lead to success and the later idea that only an
exurbanite accumulation of wealth is true success.
- Novel about an American hero, an outsider who fights to earn his dream as
he wins our hearts
Ma
When Tom returns from prison, everyone else is curious about prison life and
his release. Ma is interested in his "state of mind." Her interest
in the inner person sets her apart from the others.
Ma derives meaning in life from her family. She needs to protect them, guide
them, help them feel safe. Steinbeck calls her the "citedel" of the
family.
In chapter 10, Ma "takes her place behind the squatting men." What
does this scene and other such scenes early in the novel suggest about Ma’s
role in the family?
Can you identify at least two events that occur along the way that indicate
a shift in her position in the family? How does she seem to change?
Ma’s main ambition is to keep the family intact.
In the closing chapters, what evidence do you have that she has become the
"main" character of the novel?
The turning point is when Tom suggests the family move on without him while
he fixes the Wilsons’ car. Ma vows to smash him with a jack handle if he
insists that the family go on without him. From this point on, she is the
leader of the Joads.
Ma fails to hold the family together. Is she a failure?
Ma eventually adopts a much larger family – the family of Man – to
replace the one she’s lost.
As her immediate family dissolves, Ma adopts a larger group, the people, as
her family. "Use’ ta be the family was fust. It ain’t so now. It’s
anybody."
Tom
- Many people feel that Tom is the protagonist of this novel. There are many
evidences of this: he is the first of the Joads mentioned; the action seems to
follow his character; and his character received his name as an honor to
Steinbeck’s close friend Tom Collins, to whom the book was dedicated.
- As central as he is to the novel, his character is still somewhat confusing.
Some would argue that he is a classic American hero. Others feel he more
accurately fits the role of epic hero. Still others feel he is a
Christ-figure. What do you think? Can you give evidence to support your
thoughts?
- Tom, an ex-convict, is sturdy enough not just to take care of himself but to
support and defend others.
- Tom has a quick temper – speaks harshly to the truck driver who gives him
a lift; scolds the one-eyed man for feeling self-pity; tells off the fat man
who runs the filling station. Tom doesn’t despise each man, but only what
each stands for. Each feels defeated by life’s hardships. He can’t just
throw up his hands and walk away from problems. And he doesn’t want to see
others do that either.
- Tom defies his parole by leaving Oklahoma and ultimately at the end of the
book by devoting his life to help organize strikes.
- Tom accepts his prison punishment, but he can’t accept abusive behavior:
he hates being forced to hide from the deputies on his very own land at the
beginning of the novel; he avenges Casy’s death at the end.
- Tom is loyal, straightfoward, and realistic, in contrast to Casy, who is a
visionary. His only concern through much of the novel is the task at hand.
- Tom admires others that struggle to live a decent life. To save Floyd from
unjust arrest, Tome knocks down the deputy. To keep peace at the Saturday
night dance, Tom stands watch. To find out why workers at the Hooper Ranch
entrance were angry, he ignores the guards’ order to mind his own business.
This marks the beginning of his active following of Casy’s philosophy.
- From this point forward, Tom’s concerns extend beyond his own family to
the "family of Man."
Jim Casy
- Casy is, in many ways, not, an important character in the novel.
Steinbeck himself says that he decided to lose Casy "for a while"
during the novel.
- Casy is made to bear most explicitly the conceptual values of the novel
because Steinbeck’s method is to keep to the level of discours of his
simplest folk.
- Casy is a spokesman for the movement from "I" to "we"
- Casy know that "we got a job to do" and applies the principles of
his perceptions to help "the folks that don’ know which way to
turn."
- Casy has given up the negative or legalistic aspects of Christianity to
endorse its spirit; the metaphysics of Christianity he exchanges for those of
Emersonian transcendentalism.
- Casy has forsaken the Holy Spirit (which he sees as being apart from man)
for the human spirit.
- Casy says "the ‘Sperit ain’t in the people no more"; they seem
forsaken, lost, and lonely
- Casy says "the Sperit ain’t in me no more," a statement that he
qualifies immediately by saying that the spirit is still strong in him but has
changed from an abstract divinity to concrete action.
- Casy says "I got the call to lead the people, an’ no place to lead
‘em."
- Casy gave up preaching; also Ralph Waldo Emerson gave up the ministry
because of his unorthodoxy.
- Casy uses Emerson’s concept of the "oversoul." "Maybe all
men got one big soul ever’body’s a part of."
- Transcendentalism – Casy says, "There was the hills, an’ there was
me, an’ we wasn’t separate no more. We was on thing. An’ that one thing
was holy."
- Like Emerson, Casy came to the conviction that holiness, or goodness,
results from this feeling of unity: "I got to thinkin’ how we was holy
when we was one thing, an’ mankin’ was holy when it was one thing."
- Contrast – any man’s self-seeking destroys the unity or
"holiness" of nature: "An it [this one thing] on’y got unholy
when one mis’able little fella got the bit in his teeth, an’ run off his
own way…Fella like that bust the holiness."
- As Christ figure – Jim Casy, initials are the same as Jesus Christ’s.
- Teacher of a social gospel
- He retired to the wilderness to find spiritual truth. Jesus emerged from 40
days in the wilderness to begin his public ministry.
- Last words – "you don’t know what you’re doing" echo Christ’s
words on the cross
- Sacrificed himself for others both in the first Hooverville camp and at the
peach farm
- Tom (Thomas) became Casy’s desciple. Thomas was one of Christ’s
desciples.
- Casy and twelve Joads leave Oklahoma together. (Jesus, 12 desciples)
- Crowing of roosters the night Casy dies. Joads have to "deny" Tom
to survive at this point.
- Casy taught as one with authority. His gospel coincided in certain respects
with Jesus’ doctrine: love for all men, sympathy for the poor and oppressed,
realization of the gospel in active ministry, subordination of formal
observances to men’s real needs and property to humanity, and toleration of
men’s weaknesses and sensual desires.
- Casy eulogy for Granpa: "An’ I wouldn’ pray for a ol’ fella that’s
dead. He’s awright" echoes Christ’s message of "Let the dead
bury their dead."
- Casy’s doctrine of sin led to his positive doctrine of love, "Maybe
it ain’t a sin. Maybe it’s just the way folks is… There ain’t no sin
and there ain’t no virtue. There’s just stuff people do. It’s all part
of the same thing. And some of the things folks do is nice, and some ain’t
nice, but that’s as far as any man got a right to say."
Ending
- Steinbeck’s book opens with drought and ends with flood, waters that
return to the earth and replenish its life.
- Steinbeck wanted to end with a powerful symbol of human life persisting
despite the hostility of social forms and of nature which resulted in a
destructive storm, a still-born child, destitution and starvation. In
humiliation, discord and chaos, life struggles and – however gross and
incongruous its means – survives and is re-born out of the tempest, through
human courage, choice, and love.
- Rose of Sharon’s gift is in some ways similar to the Catholic Eucharist
(body and blood) that gives life.
- Rose of Sharon’s smile announces her initiation into a matriarchal
mystery: the capacity to nurture life.
- In saving a stranger, Rose of Sharon rises from brute survival instinct into
a nurturing state of grace.
- Rose of Sharon realizes that people need each other in order to survive. She
contributes to "the greater good."
- Two persons become one, not through sex or even love, but through their
selfless flow into a broader stream, the rising water of human endurance.
- Steinbeck wrote of this scene: "Rose of Sharon’s offering is a
survival symbol": as a woman, she represents not the alleviation of
oppression but the ability to endure it.
- Steinbeck also wrote, "I’ve tried to make the reader participate in
the actuality, what he takes from it will be scaled entirely on his own depth
or hollowness. There are five layers in this book, a reader will find as many
as he can and he won’t find more than he has in himself."
- Rose of Sharon – misfit or Madonna?
Strong Contrasts
- Hooverville camps / Weedpatch
- Oklahoma / California
- Expectations of California for the migrant (Joads) / reality
- Landowner / laborer
|